Words like this make me lament that life circumstances prevented me from engaging with maymay in 2009 and 2010 even though we were acquainted before he moved to SF
Somehow, despite all this upheaval, our sexuality communities are trapped inside aristocratic institutions that more often act with an interest in risk-avoidance instead of value-creation.
This from a post about Kink for All, a sexuality conference that started in NY and is going to Denver in February. I’m going to Denver to check it out. Secretly I am going to see if I could pull it off at home. Maymay highlights a point that is not lost on the wider BDSM community – why aren’t young people engaged in the community? Who are these people who buy the toys but never go to the events? Why don’t they come share this awesome spirit of community, learning, and exploration? How do we hook them? Or more frighteningly, what do they know that we don’t?
My question is this: how do we bring the hacker ethos and the free information ethos (as in beer, and speech, and puppies) to sexuality communities? And more over, should we?
To the latter question, I say yes. Because the forces that gave us the public library and the bill of rights are awesome and way way cooler, in my opinion, than the forces that gave us swinger clubs with high membership dues and low representation of bisexual or submissive men. Because hacker culture is nimble and adaptable, because it restructures quickly around the current needs and because it has room for both the engineer hero and the awesome power of transient community building, and that is a power I want to capture and bring into my sexuality community. So yes, I want a sexuality community that takes your radical self-resilience and raises you shared resources.
As for the how? I don’t know yet, but I think maymay is onto something. I think it starts with breaking formation – I want to take alt sex out of dungeons and hackers out of their prototypical basement caves. Maymay structured Kink for All around observer-participants, open access to the mic, and free access to the conference. I think there is one more thing to add, and it’s hard because we don’t want to say it, but I think it’s something my non-sex cultures have that my sex culture lacks:
People will say what you do not agree with and you have to be ok with that. People will use methods you’re unsure about to meet goals you care about and you need to let your emotional reaction go. The world will not coddle you, not everyone knows your triggers, people do not enjoy walking on eggshells; that’s ok. Be excellent to each other, expect difference, take what you can and leave the rest. Nuance isn’t always paradox and it if it looks like hypocrisy check again, it may well be, but it may also be a different way of looking at things. Define your win condition, be excellent to each other.
I need something from you:
- I need you to come sit with me, and talk with me and tell me what sexuality community looks like for you.
- I need you to listen, not to me, but to someone who is different from you…take the other to lunch
- I need you to stop waiting for permission and do the thing you want to see done. Ideally, if we can, I want to do it with you because there is power in shared resources.
- I need a space in which to bring 50-75 amazing people together sometime in May or maybe June to talk about sex and hackers and internet privacy
- I need to find people who care about this, who are willing to sit in a room together and start the discussion
- I need you to start breaking formation, to call people out when their language belittles submissive men, trans people, sexual women, etc
- In short, I need you to wake up, show up, and make some noise.
